Under Review
there's already a place for porn
If that's not the function of this feature I would like a feature to hide undesired series from listings and searches
The magazine category, by default, goes only to "Adult"
Not all magazines are porno, not everybody who looks at magazines is a depraved weirdo who spends their days jacking off to old pictures of their mum when she was a school girl.
Not all magazines are porno, not everybody who looks at magazines is a depraved weirdo who spends their days jacking off to old pictures of their mum when she was a school girl.
Under Review
Hello. I found a bug today (Uploads Chart). February Absent at Last 3 Months, Last 6 Months, Last Year. All Time is alright.
Under Review
Just needed a little bit of clarification regarding v2-only torrents not being recognized on the website
This seems to be the case with all YGG torrents.
Addendum:
Official statement
Hello everyone,
YGGtorrent was recently targeted by an intrusion carried out by a malicious group whose goal is to harm the site, its team, and to divert the community towards their own project.
Since then, these individuals have been spreading numerous accusations accompanied by fabricated, manipulated, or out-of-context elements, as part of a disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting YGGtorrent.
Among the claims being circulated:
During this intrusion, a copy of the site's database was indeed exfiltrated, including email addresses and encrypted passwords.
Although the encryption used is robust, we recommend as a precaution that all members change their password and associated email address, especially if this information is used on other services.
Security and infrastructure hardening operations are underway.
The tracker is already online, and the site will be back online very soon, with a major security update and many improvements.
Finally, a word for those who try to pose as vigilantes: no one has ever been forced to use YGGtorrent, nor to financially support the site. Those who didn't appreciate how it worked simply had the freedom to move on.
Instead, some chose to engage in intrusions, manipulations, and a disinformation campaign, attempting to harm real people behind the site.
This type of behavior says far more about its perpetrators than about the platform they claim to attack.
Thank you for your patience and trust.
Keep sharing.
Best regards,
The YGG Team
Addendum:
Official statement
Hello everyone,
YGGtorrent was recently targeted by an intrusion carried out by a malicious group whose goal is to harm the site, its team, and to divert the community towards their own project.
Since then, these individuals have been spreading numerous accusations accompanied by fabricated, manipulated, or out-of-context elements, as part of a disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting YGGtorrent.
Among the claims being circulated:
- that our databases and backups were destroyed (false);
- that the site would be permanently offline and impossible to restore (false);
- that we collect users' banking information (false);
- that our security relies on obsolete mechanisms like MD5 (false, this hasn't been the case for a long time);
- as well as other equally unfounded accusations.
During this intrusion, a copy of the site's database was indeed exfiltrated, including email addresses and encrypted passwords.
Although the encryption used is robust, we recommend as a precaution that all members change their password and associated email address, especially if this information is used on other services.
Security and infrastructure hardening operations are underway.
The tracker is already online, and the site will be back online very soon, with a major security update and many improvements.
Finally, a word for those who try to pose as vigilantes: no one has ever been forced to use YGGtorrent, nor to financially support the site. Those who didn't appreciate how it worked simply had the freedom to move on.
Instead, some chose to engage in intrusions, manipulations, and a disinformation campaign, attempting to harm real people behind the site.
This type of behavior says far more about its perpetrators than about the platform they claim to attack.
Thank you for your patience and trust.
Keep sharing.
Best regards,
The YGG Team
Under Review
Under Review
Report torrent is rendering on top of the drop down when you click the pull down under your user id.
steps to reproduce: go to a torrent, scrunch your window enough so that when you click your user id to get the pull down, report torrent will be on top of the pull down.
steps to reproduce: go to a torrent, scrunch your window enough so that when you click your user id to get the pull down, report torrent will be on top of the pull down.
These are all 4k:
3840 x 2080 (1440p/QHD)
3832 x 2076 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1608 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1600 (1440p/QHD)
2876 x 2156
These are all 1080p
1920 x 1040 (720p/HD)
1920 x 960 (720p/HD)
1920 x 872 (720p/HD)
1920 x 804 (720p/HD)
1440 x 1080
16:9 calcs
If the frame is 3840 wide it is 4k
stop processing
If the frame is 1920 wide is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 calcs
if the frame is 2160 high it is 4k
stop processing
if the frame is 1080 high is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 4k
2880 × 2160 is also 4k
4:3 1080p
1440 × 1080
Here is some fuzzy logic:
3840 x 2080 (1440p/QHD)
3832 x 2076 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1608 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1600 (1440p/QHD)
2876 x 2156
These are all 1080p
1920 x 1040 (720p/HD)
1920 x 960 (720p/HD)
1920 x 872 (720p/HD)
1920 x 804 (720p/HD)
1440 x 1080
16:9 calcs
If the frame is 3840 wide it is 4k
stop processing
If the frame is 1920 wide is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 calcs
if the frame is 2160 high it is 4k
stop processing
if the frame is 1080 high is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 4k
2880 × 2160 is also 4k
4:3 1080p
1440 × 1080
Here is some fuzzy logic:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import argparse
def classify_resolution(width, height):
"""
Classify video resolution as 4K, 1080p, 720p, or 480p.
Args:
width: Video width in pixels
height: Video height in pixels
Returns:
str: Resolution classification
"""
# 16:9 calculations (width-based)
if width == 3840:
return "4K"
if width == 1920:
return "1080p"
if width == 1280:
return "720p"
if width == 854 or width == 848 or width == 720:
return "480p"
# 4:3 calculations (height-based)
if height == 2160:
return "4K"
if height == 1080:
return "1080p"
if height == 720:
return "720p"
if height == 480:
return "480p"
# Fallback: classify by approximate pixel count
total_pixels = width * height
if total_pixels >= 8_000_000: # ~4K threshold (3840x2160 = 8,294,400)
return "4K"
elif total_pixels >= 1_400_000: # ~1080p threshold (midpoint between 720p and 1080p)
return "1080p"
elif total_pixels >= 600_000: # ~720p threshold (midpoint between 480p and 720p)
return "720p"
elif total_pixels >= 300_000: # ~480p threshold
return "480p"
else:
return "Unknown (below 480p)"
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
description='Classify video resolution',
formatter_class=argparse.ArgumentDefaultsHelpFormatter
)
parser.add_argument('-w', '--width', type=int, required=True,
help='Video width in pixels')
parser.add_argument('-t', '--height', type=int, required=True,
help='Video height in pixels')
args = parser.parse_args()
resolution = classify_resolution(args.width, args.height)
print(f"{args.width} x {args.height} is classified as: {resolution}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Completed
Hello. I Found a bug in my uploads: only 100 my uploads are displayed (any type of sorting).
Completed
clicking on TV - Episodes 4K UHD which goes to https://ext.to/episodes-4k-uhd/ results in a
Page not found
Incorrectly typed address, or such a page on the site no longer exists.
Dear EXT Support Team,
I hope this message finds you well.
I have recently noticed that torrents containing I2P trackers are not featured on the front page, even when they also include clear-net trackers.
In my case, I typically seed torrents using Mixed Mode (public + I2P), but these torrents do not appear on the front page.
On the other hand, torrents that only contain clear-net trackers are visible there.
I am curious to know whether this behavior is intentional (by design) or if it could potentially be a bug.
If this is a design choice, I completely understand, and there is no issue at all. I simply wanted to clarify the reasoning behind this behavior.
On the other hand, if this is an unintended bug, I would kindly request that it be addressed.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
I appreciate any clarification you can provide.
Best regards,
frigates
I hope this message finds you well.
I have recently noticed that torrents containing I2P trackers are not featured on the front page, even when they also include clear-net trackers.
In my case, I typically seed torrents using Mixed Mode (public + I2P), but these torrents do not appear on the front page.
On the other hand, torrents that only contain clear-net trackers are visible there.
I am curious to know whether this behavior is intentional (by design) or if it could potentially be a bug.
If this is a design choice, I completely understand, and there is no issue at all. I simply wanted to clarify the reasoning behind this behavior.
On the other hand, if this is an unintended bug, I would kindly request that it be addressed.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
I appreciate any clarification you can provide.
Best regards,
frigates
There is an issue, where user cannot upload either I2P-Only torrent or Mixed Mode [i2p+public trackers] torrent. Image attached
Completed
In mobile version can’t see the comments
On my uploading.and can’t see discussion box
On my uploading.and can’t see discussion box
Completed
Please fix the magnet links from search results - they are just taking us to the full 'show' page and then we have to grab the magnet there.
Completed
Hi,
Now it's not possible to download from the page that displays the results in a search, the magnetic link is not working. The link takes you to the description page instead, and then you can see the magnetic link. This makes really slow if you want to download a lot of items from a search.
Thank you.
Now it's not possible to download from the page that displays the results in a search, the magnetic link is not working. The link takes you to the description page instead, and then you can see the magnetic link. This makes really slow if you want to download a lot of items from a search.
Thank you.
Latest News
Latest Searches
Sites In Our Index
Suggestion Box
Share your ideas to help improve our community